Ross ---> When two duties conflict you pick the duty which is in the circumstances more of a duty rather than an utilitarian question of bringing more good into existence by the one action over the other
Cases of conscience ex. fulfilling a promise or helping someone to whom I had made no promise when they would bring equal amounts of good
two theories
- Kant---> certain duties of perfect obligation
- Moore/Rashdall --> only duty is producing good --> asking which action will bring about the most good
Ross --> but its more important that our theory fit the facts than that it be simple
Jim --> yes! exactly...
Ross --> Ideal Utilitarianism of Moore/Rashdall simplifies our relations w/our fellow man in saying that the only morally significant relation in which my neighbors stand to me is that of being possible beneficiary by my action ... Ross---> yes, but they stand to me in relation of promises to promiser creditor to debtor, wife to husband, child to parent as well. That each of these relations is a prima facie duty
Ross--> when facing more than one prima facie duty in a certain situation --> I must study the situation and form a "considered opinion" of which one is more incumbent than the other.
Ross divides prima facia duties into 6 categories
Ideal Utilitarianism's defect?
Ross --> it ignores or doesn't give full justice to the highly personal character of duty
-----------
more to come --Jim
No comments:
Post a Comment