Sunday, January 17, 2010

"Republican Party Policymakers are criminally negligent..."

My microeconomics professor called Republican Party health care policy "nothing short of criminal negligence".  And this is coming from someone that studied at the University of Chicago for pete's sake! [if you don't know about economic departments University of Chicago is the department to go to if you want to grow up to become a conservative policy maker.]
 
I'll outsource the rest to Ezra Klien about our broken health care system that the Republcians are fighting so hard to keep from reforming....
 

It's hard to constantly come up with new ways to say "America spends way, way, way, way, way more than any other country on health care." But we do! Just look at the National Geographic graph above, which puts per-person spending on one side of the chart and average life expectancy on the other. Or consider this: If we spent what Canada spends per person, our deficit problem would go away entirely. And Canada's per-person average is in a country where everybody is fully covered and so has full access to care. America's is in a country with 47 million uninsured, and so many people skimp on needed care. So the comparison is actually unfair to Canada.

David Leonhardt has another way of making the point. We don't have a government-run system. But our system is so expensive that our government's partial role is pricier than the whole of government-run systems.

In per-person terms, government agencies spent roughly $4,500 on medical care, while the private sector spent roughly $3,000.

Here’s what’s notable about that $4,500 figure: It’s more than what a lot of other rich countries spend on health care — including both the public and the private sectors. All told, Canada, Belgium and Germany each spend about $4,000 per person on health care. Australia and Britain spend about $3,500 each. Japan spends a little less than that.

This is serious pitchforks-and-torches stuff, if only people really understood it. I continue to believe, however, that the improbable size of the disparity is a barrier to understanding. People just don't believe these numbers. America may not be the best, but we're not supposed to be the worst by such a large margin. If we just spent 15% more than everyone else, people might be more willing to listen.

Posted via email from Jim Nichols

No comments:

Post a Comment