Every so often, his findings are trumpeted as proof that conservatives are more genuinely compassionate than liberals. And that's exactly what Nick Kristof did over the weekend.
But the difference can be explained in one word, and it's not "compassion." It's "religion." A recent survey from Google similarly found that self-identified conservatives gave more to charity than did self-identified liberals. But they also found that "if donations to all religious organizations are excluded, liberals give slightly more to charity than conservatives do." Indeed, religious congregations are far and away the largest recipients of charitable gifts: In 2006, they made up 32.8 percent of all giving. But is that charity, at least charity as Kristof and Brooks are defining it? For instance: Utah is among the most Republican states in the nation, largely because of its heavily conservative Mormon population. Mormons tithe 10 percent a week to their church. But is that charitable giving? Or is it a membership fee? How much of it goes to anti-poverty programming? How much to church administration?
Saying that conservatives give more to charity is another way of saying that conservatives are more religious.
“Passion and prejudice govern the world; only under the name of reason” --John Wesley
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Who really cares?
Ezra Klein on conservatives and charitable giving... DO LIBERALS HATE CHARITY?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment