Although the headline says "developers" this is really about property investors who bought commercial buildings at the price peak and are now underwater. But say the owners default and the properties are transferred to the bondholders - what is the risk to the economy? None.
With the automakers there was a concern that a large number of jobs would be lost without a bailout. How many jobs will be lost if the ownership of an office building or mall changes? Very few.
The article suggests there is a concern that some owners will not be able to refinance because of the credit crisis, even though their properties have strong positive cash flow. But that seems like a liquidity issue for the Fed and the banks, and doesn't seem to require a bailout from the Treasury.
I don't see the argument for a bailout.
“Passion and prejudice govern the world; only under the name of reason” --John Wesley
Monday, December 22, 2008
bailout city...
WSJ: Commercial Property Investors Seek Bailout
Labels:
behavioral economics,
ec
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment