Showing posts with label ga leg '09. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ga leg '09. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Middle-Income tax hike possible here in GA

Last Friday, the Georgia General Assembly passed a budget for fiscal year 2010 that includes a major tax cut for the wealthy (an exclusion for long-term capital gains income) and a substantial tax increase for the middle-class (eliminating a state-funded property tax relief program). A new report from ITEP concludes that ithis proposal was fully implemented in 2008, the poorest 95 percent of Georgia taxpayers would pay, on average, higher state taxes than they do now. 

The proposed capital gains tax break would allow investors to exclude 50 percent of their long term capital gains income from the state income tax when fully implemented in 2012. If the capital gains tax cut had been fully implemented in tax year 2008, Georgia residents would have seen a total tax cut of about $340 million, and the very richest 1 percent would receive an incredible 77 percent of that. (For more on flaws of capital gains tax breaks at the state level, see ITEP's report A Capital Idea.)
 
The property tax increase used to offset the costs would eliminate the Homeowner Tax Relief Grant (HTRG). Through the grant, the state of Georgia currently pays most property taxes on the first $8,000 of a Georgia homestead’s assessed value. Since Georgia homes are assessed for tax purposes at 40 percent of their market value, this is equivalent to exempting $20,000 of a home’s market value from property taxes.

While there are certainly flaws with any homestead exemption, there are plenty of alternatives for making property tax relief fairer. For example, a property tax circuit breaker can ensure that, for homeowners and renters earning below certain income levels, property taxes do not exceed a certain share of a family’s income. (For more on the benefits of property tax circuit breakers, see ITEP's
policy brief.)
 
The repeal of the Homeowner Tax Relief Grant should, in theory, have given lawmakers an important opportunity to rethink its approach to property tax relief. But the budget plan squanders most of the tax savings from HTRG repeal on a poorly-conceived long-term capital gains tax cut for a small number of the wealthiest Georgians. Governor Sonny Perdue should know that approving these changes would amount to a blatant shifting of state taxes from the rich to the middle-class.
Here is a factsheet on Capital Gains from GBPI, which notes:
 

Capital gains tax preferences are costly, inequitable, and ineffective. They deprive states of millions of dollars in needed funds, benefit almost exclusively the very wealthiest members of society, and fail to promote economic growth in the manner their proponents claim.

• Capital gains are the profits one realizes from the sale of an asset, such as stocks, bonds, investment or vacation real estate, art, or antiques.

• The two most common assets held by working Americans – their investments for retirement and their homes – generally are not treated as taxable capital gains when they are sold. Assets held in 401(k)s or Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) – the means by which most households own stocks and bonds – are considered "ordinary" income when they are sold and are therefore ineligible for capital gains tax breaks.

• In practice, very few low- and moderate-income Georgia taxpayers report income from capital gains. Federal data from 2006 indicate that, in Georgia, taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) of less than $50,000 comprised 69 percent of all federal tax returns filed, but constituted just 8 percent of all returns with income from capital gains. Similarly, taxpayers in this income group held 26 percent of Georgia AGI in 2006, but received just 4 percent of reported capital gains income.

 
 

Posted via web from jimnichols's posterous

Friday, April 10, 2009

Education bills... awaiting the Governor's signature

From the inbox:

The following bills have passed the Georgia General Assembly and are awaiting the Governor's signature.  GAE has monitored and advocated either for or against (and offered an alternative) to each piece of legislation represented.  On the last day of session, many of the bills became vehicles for legislative initiatives that may not have had a chance of passing on their own.
 
Please contact the Governor and request that he signs the following legislation:
 
HB 243 - The original proposal eliminated the 10% stipend for all National Board Certified Teachers. We were able to get the bill amended to allow teachers who already receive the bonus to continue receiving it. However the funding is contingent upon yearly funding by the General Assembly. Governor Perdue still has discretion over line item veto in the FY 10 budget and could possibly veto HB 243.  Therefore we strongly encourage you to contact the Governor and ask him to support the budget line item for National Board Certified Teachers as passed via House Bill 243.
 
HB 251 - Public school student allowed to attend another school within the district provided permanent classroom space is available and parents assume responsibility and cost for transportation.
 
HB 149 - "Move on When Ready" Act - Public school students given the option to attend community college or technical school to complete work for their high school diploma.
 
HB 193 - School calendar based on hours, with a minimum of instructional time each day. School systems also given the option, beginning 2010-2011, to close schools on Veterans Day [November 11] to enable students, teachers, etc. to participate in Veterans Day programs.
 
SB 178 - Includes language from the BRIDGE bill [HB 400], which gives students a choice of focused programs of study and prepares them for postsecondary studies and careers.
 
HB 63 - Tax Allocation Districts (TADs) tightens the definition of redevelopment area associated with TADs-eliminates vague, overbroad  and undefined terms, limits TADs to "urbanized" areas.
 
SB 8 - Students allowed to carry auto-injectable Epinephrine and requires every school system to adopt a policy authorizing the carrying and administration of such prescriptions.
 
HB 229 - School systems to conduct an annual fitness assessment program one time each school year for students in grades one through twelve.
 
HB 371 - Allows increased  TRS investments in equities when markets are stable.
 
Please request the Governor to veto the following legislation. Click here to contact the Governor:
 
HB 100 - Tax credit program for Student Scholarship Organizations (SSOs). SSOs are Tax shelters that funnel funds to private schools depleting public school resources.
 
HB 233 - Property tax assessments capped at 3%.
 
HB 280 - Governor's initiative to start new, fully-certified math and science teachers at the same salary as a fifth year teacher.
 
Marcus W. Downs
Director of Government Relations
Georgia Association of Educators

do with it what you will.

Posted via web from jimnichols's posterous

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Sunday, January 18, 2009

joint economic development hearing 1/15/08

We heard from the home builders, and developers, and GEDA. We did not hear from consumer groups...

--the housing bubble was not unforeseen, builders and developers helped increase the bubble--i.e. they made bad business decisions?

--according to them we have "pent up demand" but they also stated we have have about 148,000 vacant lots — a 117-month supply.... meaning we have an abundance of supply not demand the idea that we need to "get people back into the market place" is absurd no? [what they mean is the market place for new homes but we're talking about the housing market broadly when we are speaking about economic development because vacant homes and homes that won't sell hurt economic development also?]

--tax credits or reductions for vacant lots or houses helps those who are sitting on over capacity--why not help those trying to sell or buy the homes they are in rather than investors? Those who are sitting on vanct lots or empty houses helped perpetuate the crisis and profit off it--bad business decisions on their part
would a tax credit for down payment on housing be only on new houses or any house on the market?

--why should regulatory arena be more even across the state? Why view home building as a statewide industry? Thats to assume that urban and rural housing needs the same regulation. One would assume that we would have to have the tighter urban regulations on rural areas which would make no sense? [i'm certain builders would want rural regulations on urban areas--which would harm urban areas?]

--removing impact fee's on roads would be the single biggest cost that would be passed on to local communities and would increase incentive to build (by reducing cost to builder) beyond the means of the existing roads?

here's the ajc article: Legislature considers ways to jump-start home building

--what was the deal with the cut your own firewood because of global warming joke from the chair?