Sunday, November 25, 2012

A reminder that I really need to start working harder on my French and German...

How to spot a blame the union meme

Any time number crunchers and corporate wizards start blaming union's in the media for a business failure you know its a good time to look under the hood and see what's really going wrong at the company.  

Hostess is a great example of shoddy management running a company into the ground.

Hiltzik: Poor management, not union intransigence, killed Hostess - latimes.com

The company had known for a decade or more that its market was changing, but had done nothing to modernize its product line or distribution system. Its trucks were breaking down. It was keeping unprofitable stores open and having trouble figuring out how to move inventory to customers and when. It had cut back advertising and marketing to the point where it was barely communicating with customers. It had gotten hundreds of millions of dollars in concessions from its unions, and spent none of it on these essential improvements.

The true recent history of Hostess can be excavated from piles of public filings from its two bankruptcy cases. To start with, the company has had six CEOs in the last 10 years, which is not exactly a precondition for consistent and effective corporate strategizing.

The most recent and presumably final incumbent, Gregory Rayburn, had been with the company all of nine days before taking over in March when Driscoll, who earlier had been described in court papers as "key to … the future well-being" of the company, departed suddenly and without explanation.

Hostess first entered bankruptcy in 2004, when it was known as Interstate Bakeries. During its five years in Chapter 11, the firm obtained concessions from its unions worth $110 million a year. The unions accepted layoffs that brought the workforce down to about 19,000 from more than 30,000. There were cuts in wages, pension and health benefits. The Teamsters committed to negotiations over changes in antiquated work rules. The givebacks helped reduce Hostess' labor costs to the point where they were roughly equal  to or even lower than some of its major competitors'.

But the firm emerged from bankruptcy with more debt than when it went in — in with $575 million, out with $774 million, all secured by company assets. That's pretty much the opposite of what's supposed to happen in bankruptcy. By the end, there was barely a spare distributor cap in the motor pool that wasn't mortgaged to the private equity firms and hedge funds holding the notes (and also appointing management).

As management experts such as Peter Drucker have observed, the goal of a successful business must be to find and serve customers. Do that, and the numbers take care of themselves. The Hostess approach was entirely backward — meeting the numbers became Job One, and figuring out how to grow the business became Job None.

The post-bankruptcy leadership never executed a growth strategy. It failed to introduce a significant new product or acquire a single new brand. It lagged on bakery automation and product R&D, while rivals such as Bimbo Bakeries USA built research facilities and hired food scientists to keep their product lines fresh. At the time of the 2004 bankruptcy, Hostess was three times the size of Bimbo. Today it's less than half Bimbo's size. (Bimbo, which has been acquiring bakeries such as Sara Lee and Entenmann's right and left, might well end up with Hostess' brands.)

Saturday, November 24, 2012

What Occupy Wall Street did in real time @ForRespect is going to do for real lives.

D0b8783e357911e28fa722000a1fbcea_7

So I've got final papers for class to write so I don't really have time to do the kind of in-depth structured/well-edited blog post I want to write on yesterday's historic Walmart strike and the solidarity picket lines held all across the country.  

Instead i'm going to throw out some of my thoughts and some of the pictures I shot from yesterday's action here in Atlanta.  Hopefully it'll come out clear and coherent enough for you.  Pardon my ramble...  

Dcd3f710358311e28a5622000a1fbe35_7
As someone who was watching the Occupy Wall Street movement quite closely from right out of the gate I can say that I'm feeling the same level of excitement with what transpired all across the nation yesterday that I felt with Occupy.

I remember sitting at the Occupy Atlanta General Assembly the weekend before OA voted to occupy the park being simply overwhelmed with enthusiasm. 

I also remember quite clearly driving back into the suburbs that evening to meet up for dinner with the wife and some friends and being struck with internal confusion about the fact that neither my wife nor friends could really care less, nor catch catch on from my slight pokes and prods about the reasons for my jovial excitement in regards to what was about to blow up here in Atlanta

83eaaba8358311e2a07e22000a1f9a28_7
I feel a similar sense of excitement about the efforts by employees at Walmart @ForRespect.

The corporate apologists and anti-union minions trying to cheer on the 1% by declaring yesterday to be a defeat for those trying to bring change to Walmart are showing their hand by clearly signalling they don't understand (or maybe want us to understand) the context of internal organizing in massive bureaucratic global institutions, the history of successful labor organizing, nor the impacts neoliberalism have had (structurally and culturally) on the ability of working people to stand up for themselves and mobilize their coworkers.

Afe12330357a11e2b8f122000a1f9345_7
Opponents of yesterdays action see symbols of "defeat"  from the fact that the number of employee's didn't meet their level of expectation.  The slave master's expectation of their slaves capacity to do things like vote responsibly or run for public office weren't met either but that didn't mean the slave masters were correct about the human capacities of their "property".  It just meant the slave masters were using the wrong damn metrics for judging the potential of the human beings in front of them.

9e4629e2358211e283b822000a9f124c_7
After I got off my shift at work I headed over to our picket here in Atlanta organized by Jobs with Justice.  I'm a Teamster, thats how we roll on Black Friday.  

Many customers took our fliers and decided to turn around in support.  I can tell you that the thumbs up and smiles from workers driving past our picket headed into work at a local Walmart here in Atlanta tell me that yesterday's action and the community support that showed up all across this country will inspire more leaders to arise within the ranks of Walmart to start the long hard process of internal organizing.  That is huge.

178a2050357a11e2900e22000a1f96c7_7
Internal organizing sucks.  As a union steward on the pre-load --we are the part timers who load up the big brown trucks early in the morning while you guys sleep--at UPS I deal with it every day.  I could go on and on about the the challenges/barriers of communication, the fear of retaliation for speaking up (let alone responding and fighting back) with others about harassment or working conditions, and the sense of futility that comes from the natural and to be expected setbacks and challenges.  I could go on and on--and I probably should be doing more blog posting on it because I think its something many outside of the labor movement can't quite accurately get the pulse of.  

But even beyond the challenges of internal organizing I can tell you from my own personal experience that the number of strikers who did walk out is quite impressive.  As a union steward I have the single largest collectively bargained contract at my back when I bring grievances to "the boss".  Despite this, I still find myself in circumstance where I feel intimidation and harassment from supervisors.  I still have major problems inspiring coworkers to stand up for themselves--even in circumstances where they can recite explicitly in the contact the violation  taking place.  Its just not east. 

Shit man, we have to face facts. Telling the boss they are wrong or have screwed up (or even worse that their boss did) is hard
Fd2ed224358711e29fa922000a1f8feb_7
Trying to expose and speak out about the fact that some number cruncher at corporate headquarters has poorly allocated resources leaving everyone in a bind when it comes to safety or production quality is really really hard to do.  Often times workers don't have the education or confidence to articulate their position so they respond in a less than productive manner.  But over time people can be taught how to stand up to the nitpicking and excuses management give, the intimidation and harassment.  They can be inspired to speak out about what they know to be wrong.
0aed73ac358311e2ac5022000a9f18b3_7
Over time people can learn productive ways to build internal alliance on the shop-floor and overcome the fear and intimidation they have to deal with every day.  

I can tell you for every person that walked out yesterday there is someone who was gong to walk out but just didn't do it--out of fear, frustration that no one else would, or simply not needing the headache.  Hell, I can't blame them. There have been many a day that I threw up my hands, shut my mouth, and did my job when I knew I should be standing up to violations of the contract.  You don't take on a corporation by yourself.  Many times you must stand down to fight another day.  That's why yesterday was a major success.  All across this nation communities came out to let Walmart workers know they support them and will stand with them.

Yesterday was a major success and a major step in efforts to improve working conditions at Walmart and I can't wait for the next time @ForRespect asks for community support.

I'll be there.
73b8f124358611e29f1422000a1fbc0e_7
What Occupy Wall Street did in real time @ForRespect is going to do for real lives. That sounds pejorative and condescending to those who took and held Zuccotti Park.  I don't intend it to be and I know this broad generalization won't fit many of those involved in Occupy.  But think about it.  In many ways Occupy Wall Street and efforts and @ForRespect are at opposite ends of the spectrum.  

Where Occupy was putting its focus on very abstract questions of debt/high finance @ForRespect is focusing on very basic real world questions of safety, working conditions, and wages.  
A0b03f54358411e2a57122000a1fbe0e_7
Where Occupy had a small army of extremely educated young people with time and skill sets bubbling out their ears, sitting together in one specific area, @ForRespect is facing a nation of Walmarts dispersed across the wastelands of the Reagan revolution--where education levels, time able to put into organizing, and skill sets needed to communicate and coordinate alliances are limited.  

These challenges cannot be addressed in one Facebook update or 4 hour general assembly debate.

Where Occupy wants a radical revaluation of our entire political and economic system @ForRespect just wants equity.  @ForRespect doesn't want revolution they are just workers within a corporation who want a Walmart that flourishes for everyone rather than just the Walton's.

In many ways @ForRespect is to the neoliberal era's Main Street what Occupy is to Wall Street.
94bea626358511e2ad6322000a9f14f2_7
What Occupy Wall Street did in real time @ForRespect is going to do for real lives. Sure its gonna take longer... but stay tuned, we haven't even reached our Brooklyn Bridge moment yet!

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Georgia Senate District 17 Candidate "Party-Switcher" for more bigoted climates...

What a really strange way to misread last nights election results across the nation.  Especially for a state that is trending blue.

This without further comment.

Dr. Nelva Lee Switches Party

First, let me say a hearty thanks to all of my supporters. Those who prayed for me, volunteered, and donated to my campaign, thank you!

While this was my first campaign for elected office, I have been a political junky all of my life and have known that I would run for office someday as I believe that political service is my life’s purpose. I ran as a conservative democrat because that is what I have always considered myself. I was disappointed when conservative democrats became a dying breed in Washington and even in Georgia. However, since the primaries, the Democratic platform has become even more liberal, embracing views that are different than my conservative values of pro-Life and anti-gay marriage. So it is with a heavy heart that I leave the Democratic Party for the Republican effective today.

I want to also take the time to congratulate my opponent Rick Jeffares on his win, and to inform him that he will most likely see me again as his challenger in the 2014 Primaries. I am encouraged in this endeavor by many republicans who wished to see me run as a Republican in this past race and who pledged their support if I chose to run again on the Republican ticket.

Georgia Senate District 17 Candidate "Party-Switcher" for more bigoted climates...

What a really strange way to misread last nights election results across the nation.  Especially for a state that is trending blue.

This without further comment.

Dr. Nelva Lee Switches Party

First, let me say a hearty thanks to all of my supporters. Those who prayed for me, volunteered, and donated to my campaign, thank you!

While this was my first campaign for elected office, I have been a political junky all of my life and have known that I would run for office someday as I believe that political service is my life’s purpose. I ran as a conservative democrat because that is what I have always considered myself. I was disappointed when conservative democrats became a dying breed in Washington and even in Georgia. However, since the primaries, the Democratic platform has become even more liberal, embracing views that are different than my conservative values of pro-Life and anti-gay marriage. So it is with a heavy heart that I leave the Democratic Party for the Republican effective today.

I want to also take the time to congratulate my opponent Rick Jeffares on his win, and to inform him that he will most likely see me again as his challenger in the 2014 Primaries. I am encouraged in this endeavor by many republicans who wished to see me run as a Republican in this past race and who pledged their support if I chose to run again on the Republican ticket.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

The radical Left-wing rag The Financial Times-- endorses Obama

Radical leftwinger indeed.

The Financial Times endorses Obama.

"Obama is the wiser bet for crisis-hit US":

As in his response to Hurricane Sandy, Mr Obama has shown that purposeful government can be part of the solution rather than the problem. Four years on from the financial crisis, with extreme inequality an affront to the American dream, there remains a need for intelligent, reformist governance. Mr Obama, his presidency defined by the economic crisis, looks the better choice.